A worked example
The losses that outlived the income
Sam, 52, single, spent three years running a venture of their own at a heavy annual loss, funded out of savings, and stopped working when it ended. $900,000 in pre-tax accounts, $100,000 in a Roth, $1,200,000 in a brokerage account, spending $90,000 a year.
“The business is over and the losses were bigger than anything I earned. Is there anything left to do with them, or did they die with it?”
What the projection shows
Stopping work turns most of the tax bill off: lifetime tax in present value is $53,372, and the first four years owe no federal tax at all. What the year table does not say out loud is what is left over afterwards. A loss under §172 never expires and offsets income of any kind, but there is no income left for it to offset — so the plan finishes still carrying losses it never spends, while $900,000 of pre-tax money waits to be taxed as ordinary income whenever it comes out. The deduction and the tax bill are sitting in the same household and nothing makes them meet. A conversion in the empty years is what would spend one against the other, and no part of this plan asks for one.
What the projection also found
Nothing here was left blank. These follow from the figures above, under the assumptions this example states.
- The plan finishes still carrying $276,889 of business losses it never spends, while $440,522 waits in pre-tax accounts to be taxed on the way out.
The planner arrives with this household already filled in. Change anything — the balances, the ages, the assumptions — and run it as yourself.
A projection under stated assumptions, not financial or tax advice.